The government of New South Wales (NSW) has unveiled highly controversial legislation that would give police sweeping powers to bar public protests for up to three months following a declared terrorism incident, sparking intense debate about civil liberties, public safety and political speech in the aftermath of the Bondi Beach terror attack that killed 15 people. Premier Chris Minns has explicitly linked this proposed crackdown on demonstrations — particularly pro-Palestinian rallies — to the risk of further unrest, a move that has drawn both support and sharp criticism across Australia.
Extraordinary Powers Under Proposed Terrorism Laws
Under the proposed changes to NSW’s terrorism and public order laws, authorities would be able to issue so-called “public assembly restriction declarations” after a terrorist incident — effectively stopping protest organisers from applying for permits or holding large-scale rallies in specified areas for up to 90 days without court oversight. Premier Minns has defended the proposal on grounds of safety, arguing that mass demonstrations could inflame community tensions in times of heightened anxiety.
The government says these powers are aimed at preventing situations where large crowds of demonstrators may clash with law enforcement or other community groups, or fuel hate-fueled violence in a charged environment. Officials have expressed particular concern about the potential for protests to spiral into security risks following major incidents such as the Bondi massacre.
Linking Protests to Terror: Minns’s Rationale
Premiers and senior ministers have framed the legislation as part of a broader response to recent deadly violence. Mr Minns has publicly tied some pro-Palestinian demonstrations, such as those held in response to the Gaza conflict earlier in 2025, to underlying social tensions that he believes are “not being contained” — language that critics say conflates peaceful protest with extremism. NSW police have warned of a “significant policing response” to upcoming unauthorised gatherings, underscoring the state’s readiness to use enhanced powers if the legislation passes.
Demonstrations earlier in the year attracted massive crowds — for example a pro-Palestine march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge drew tens of thousands in August 2025 — illustrating how large and sustained some rallies have been. Protest organisers have stressed that their events were peaceful expressions of solidarity with civilians in Gaza and unrelated to the Bondi shooting.
Supporters: Public Safety and Unified Response
Supporters of the protest restrictions, including some political figures and community leaders, argue the extraordinary circumstances following a terrorist attack justify extraordinary powers. They say that large demonstrations occurring soon after a violent incident can exacerbate grief, distract from recovery efforts and risk clashes between opposing groups. Some Jewish community representatives, while focusing more on hate speech and antisemitism reforms, have also expressed concerns about public safety at volatile rallies.
In this view, the state’s priority should be ensuring that mourning and civic recovery are not undermined by further disruptions or gestures that could provoke distress among victims’ families or targeted communities.
Critics: Threat to Civil Liberties and Democratic Rights
Civil rights advocates, protest organisers and some political opponents have condemned the proposed legislation as an unprecedented curtailment of democratic freedoms, characterising it as authoritarian overreach. They argue that using the Bondi terror attack as a pretext to silence political dissent — especially on contentious issues such as the Israel–Gaza conflict — risks eroding fundamental rights to free expression and assembly.
Groups like the Palestinian Action Group (PAG) have warned that classifying long-standing protests under a “terrorism designation” sets a dangerous precedent, potentially stigmatizing legitimate activism and discouraging civic participation. Legal experts have also raised concerns that bypassing court involvement in restricting protests could face constitutional challenges, with critics stressing the need for judicial oversight in decisions that curb civil liberties.
Political Division and Legislative Battle Ahead
The protest ban proposal has generated debate within NSW politics itself. While some elements of the opposition have signaled tentative support, focusing on public safety, others have called for more measured approaches that preserve rights. The government has indicated it will recall parliament urgently to debate this and other “post-Bondi” reforms — including tougher gun control measures — ahead of the summer parliamentary recess.
Premier Minns’s strategy reflects broader political pressure to respond visibly and swiftly in the wake of the Bondi attack, particularly as fears of antisemitism and social fragmentation have been amplified nationally. Yet the balancing act between security and democratic freedoms promises to be a contentious feature of public discourse as the legislative process unfolds.
Public Reaction and Community Tensions
Public reaction has been deeply mixed. Many community members, still in mourning for the victims of the Bondi shooting, have voiced support for steps they believe enhance safety and prevent further violence. Others argue that measures affecting free speech risk alienating segments of society and intensifying political divides — especially as protests had been a regular feature of civic life long before the terror attack.
This debate unfolds against the backdrop of heightened security across NSW, with police issuing warnings about large gatherings and reinforcing patrols around public venues. As the state navigates grief, political friction and the limits of emergency powers, the coming weeks are likely to test Australia’s legal frameworks for balancing safety with democratic rights — a challenge not unique to NSW but at the heart of contemporary governance around the world.
7 years in the field, from local radio to digital newsrooms. Loves chasing the stories that matter to everyday Aussies – whether it’s climate, cost of living or the next big thing in tech.
