Australians will soon see one of the country’s most substantial public inquiries in years, as the federal government has announced a Royal Commission into the Bondi Beach terror attack and broader issues related to antisemitism and social cohesion. The inquiry — established amid rising public pressure and political debate — is designed to grapple not just with the specifics of the December 14 massacre but also wider “drivers” of hate and extremism in Australian society.
Origins of the Royal Commission
The move to launch a royal commission came after weeks of mounting demands from victims’ families, Jewish community groups, opposition politicians and public supporters for a national inquiry rather than a limited review. Initially resistant to a Commonwealth-level probe, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese ultimately reversed course, opting for a national inquiry to replace a planned New South Wales state royal commission.
The decision followed the worst terrorist attack in modern Australian history, when gunmen opened fire during a Hanukkah event at Bondi Beach on December 14, killing 15 people and injuring dozens more. The attack, which authorities have described as religiously and ideologically motivated, sharply focused attention on how antisemitism and extremism are manifesting in Australia.
Who Will Lead the Inquiry
Former High Court Justice Virginia Bell has been appointed as Commissioner. Bell’s experience with sensitive national inquiries — including the Robodebt royal commission — has been cited as central to her selection and to the credibility of the process. Bell will have broad powers under federal royal commission law to compel testimony, demand documents and call public hearings, subject to legal protections aimed at avoiding interference with ongoing criminal proceedings related to the Bondi attack.
States and territories have been invited to participate, and the New South Wales government has dropped its own inquiry plan in favour of cooperating with the national process, signaling a unified approach across jurisdictions.
Core Areas of Investigation
The royal commission’s terms of reference — the formal outline of what it will examine — cover several broad and interrelated areas:
1. The Nature and Prevalence of Antisemitism in Australia
The commission will investigate how antisemitism — including religiously and ideologically motivated hatred — manifests in contemporary Australian society, how prevalent it is, and what social conditions have contributed to its rise.
2. Effectiveness of Institutional Responses
A key focus will be on law enforcement, border control, immigration, security agencies and intelligence bodies. The commission will assess whether these institutions are sufficiently equipped, coordinated and resourced to identify and counter antisemitic threats and violent extremism.
3. Circumstances Surrounding the Bondi Attack
While a criminal trial of the surviving alleged shooter will proceed independently, the royal commission will review what is known about the events surrounding the attack — including whether there were systemic failings or intelligence and communication gaps among agencies that might have prevented it or mitigated its impact.
4. Social Cohesion and Future Prevention
The inquiry is also tasked with suggesting measures to strengthen community resilience, promote social cohesion and counter the spread of ideological and religious extremism. This may involve recommendations on education, public discourse, online safety and community support.
Interim and Final Reporting Timelines
The commission is expected to balance thorough investigation with urgency. An interim report is due by April 2026, providing a preliminary overview and recommendations on immediate or pressing issues. The final report is scheduled for delivery by 14 December 2026, one year after the Bondi attack. This long-form timeframe allows the inquiry to delve deeply into structural and societal issues while still providing actionable guidance within a discrete period.
Powers and Procedures: How It Will Work
Federal royal commissions in Australia operate under the Royal Commissions Act, giving them strong investigatory tools, including:
- Compulsory powers to summon witnesses and require document production
- Public hearings with testimony under oath
- Private sessions where necessary for sensitive information
- Submissions from community groups, experts and individuals
Unlike internal government reviews, a royal commission’s proceedings and final reports are typically public, fostering transparency and accountability. However, in matters involving national security or ongoing criminal proceedings, some elements may be held privately or subject to redactions to avoid prejudicing judicial processes.
The commission will also incorporate the ongoing intelligence and law enforcement review led by former senior official Dennis Richardson, folding its findings into the broader inquiry rather than duplicating efforts. This combined approach aims to ensure federal agencies’ roles are scrutinised alongside wider social factors.
Political and Community Reactions
The announcement has drawn a mix of support and scrutiny. Jewish community leaders and families of victims welcomed the comprehensive nature of the commission, viewing it as a step toward transparency and reform. Some advocates have emphasised that only a federal inquiry — rather than a limited state one — can fully unpack the roles of national bodies and systemic issues.
Critics, including some political figures, had initially argued that a royal commission could be lengthy, costly and potentially platform division, favouring more contained agency reviews. Still, the eventual federal decision reflects significant national consensus that the scale and implications of the Bondi attack go beyond the scope of standard departmental investigations.
Why It Matters: Beyond a Single Tragedy
This royal commission is more than an inquiry into one horrific event. It represents a broader attempt to confront antisemitism, extremism and social division at a national level, seeking lessons that could shape legislation, policing, community support and public discourse for years to come.
As a public, judge-led investigation with expansive reach and legal authority, the commission promises to offer not just answers about what went wrong, but a roadmap for strengthening Australian society against hate-fuelled violence in the future.
7 years in the field, from local radio to digital newsrooms. Loves chasing the stories that matter to everyday Aussies – whether it’s climate, cost of living or the next big thing in tech.
