Shocking Incident at Perth Invasion Day Rally
Perth — Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has called for the “full force of the law” to be applied after a man allegedly threw a homemade explosive device into a crowd at an Invasion Day rally in Perth’s CBD, condemning the act as shocking and underscoring the gravity of the situation. The incident, which occurred on January 26, 2026, forced the evacuation of hundreds of protesters and drew widespread political and public attention as authorities intensify investigations into motives and charges.
The prime minister’s comments came as the 31-year-old suspect appeared in Perth Magistrates Court, charged with serious offences including intent to do harm and making or possessing explosives under suspicious circumstances. He did not apply for bail, and his identity is suppressed for safety reasons as legal proceedings continue.
What Happened: Device Thrown Into Crowd
The alleged attack unfolded during an Invasion Day rally — a gathering held annually on January 26 by Indigenous Australians and supporters to mark the cultural impact of British colonisation. Around 2,500 people were gathered in Forrest Place plaza when witnesses saw a man allegedly remove an object from his bag and throw it from a first-floor walkway into the assembled crowd.
Police quickly evacuated the area and established an exclusion zone around the plaza. Forensic specialists later examined the object and confirmed it was a homemade improvised explosive device containing a mix of volatile chemicals, ball bearings, screws and nails — components that could turn it into a “fragment bomb” capable of causing severe injuries or fatalities. Authorities say the device failed to detonate.
Video footage released by law enforcement shows the man hurling the object into the crowd before fleeing and being promptly arrested at the scene. Police allege the suspect acted alone, and work continues to reconstruct the device and analyse evidence from his home and electronic devices.
Prime Minister’s Response: “Throw the Book at Him”
Speaking to reporters in Darwin, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese described the alleged act as “quite shocking” and called for prosecutors to apply the full extent of the law if the man is found guilty. “This was an incident that is quite shocking,” Albanese said, adding that the accused had been charged with “two serious offences” and that he looked forward to a strong prosecution.
Albanese’s remarks emphasized the importance of legal accountability while respecting the judicial process, noting that the matter was before the courts and that further comments were limited by legal constraints.
Investigation Underway: Potential Terrorism Inquiry
Western Australia Police, the Australian Federal Police (AFP) and domestic security agency ASIO are all involved in the ongoing investigation. Authorities have confirmed that the device is being treated as a possible “hostile act,” and investigators are assessing whether the incident could qualify as a terrorist act, pending evidence of political, religious or ideological motivation.
For now, police have emphasised that there is no ongoing threat to public safety, even as they continue forensic analysis and interviews. The arrest and search of the suspect’s residence have yielded materials consistent with bomb-making, according to officials, and additional charges may be laid depending on evidence gathered.
Community and Political Reactions
The incident has sparked a broad range of reactions across the country. While Albanese’s call for legal consequences drew support from many, some First Nations leaders and advocates have urged a stronger and more explicit response, including classification of the attack as a hate crime or terrorism. Amnesty International Australia, for instance, has called for authorities to treat the incident as a hate crime, given the rally’s First Nations focus, urging comprehensive investigations and stronger anti-racism measures.
Independent Senator Lidia Thorpe and others have questioned why the incident has not yet been officially labelled terrorism, arguing that the targeted nature of the attack and its potential for mass harm warrant a more forceful government stance. Critics have also said the choice of language around the event may reflect broader challenges in addressing violence and threats against marginalized communities.
Eyewitness Accounts and Event Impact
Attendees described moments of chaos as police urgently directed crowds to clear the area. RCA interviews with rally participants recount how officers formed cordons and repeatedly called out for people to move back for their safety, with many participants commending the orderly evacuation despite the alarming circumstances.
One witness described how the object landed in front of others in the crowd, prompting immediate concern and swift action by those nearby. Fortunately, the device’s failure to detonate meant that no serious injuries were reported, though the psychological impact on those present has been significant.
Broader Context: Security and Public Events in Australia
The rally occurred during a week of national reflection and protest, with large groups gathering across cities to mark Invasion Day — a day of remembrance for many Indigenous Australians. Police presence at such events has previously focused on ensuring safety and managing crowd movements, but the Perth incident represents a rare spike in violent threat perception.
Security experts note that past threats targeting public rallies have prompted authorities to continually review policing protocols, surveillance and threat assessment strategies to safeguard participants while respecting civil liberties. Albanese’s response reflects a government balancing firm condemnation of violence with legal due process and community sensitivity.
Legal Process and Next Steps
The suspect’s next court appearance is scheduled for February 17, 2026, where prosecutors will continue to outline their case and potentially seek additional charges. Legal analysts expect debates over the appropriate classification of the offence — whether as standard criminal conduct, a hate crime, or terrorism — to play out in subsequent hearings.
As investigations proceed, federal and state authorities have reiterated there is no ongoing threat to the public. Nevertheless, the incident has reignited discussions about extremism, public safety at protests, and the legal frameworks available to address politically or ideologically motivated violence in Australia.
7 years in the field, from local radio to digital newsrooms. Loves chasing the stories that matter to everyday Aussies – whether it’s climate, cost of living or the next big thing in tech.
