BRISBANE — The Queensland government has proposed a landmark set of hate speech laws that would make the use of certain controversial slogans, most notably “from the river to the sea”, a criminal offence in public spaces — part of sweeping reforms aimed at combating antisemitism and protecting vulnerable communities in the wake of a deadly terror attack.
New Legislation Targets Slogans and Symbols Tied to Violence
Premier David Crisafulli and Attorney-General Deb Frecklington unveiled the proposed legislation — expected to be introduced to the Queensland Parliament this week — that explicitly bans the public distribution, display or recitation of phrases deemed to incite menace, harassment or offence. The list of prohibited expressions includes the pro-Palestinian chant “from the river to the sea” and “globalise the intifada”. Violators could face up to two years in prison, reflecting the government’s intent to treat such speech as a serious public order offence.
The move would make Queensland the first Australian state to outlaw the chant — a slogan historically associated with pro-Palestinian demonstrations but now framed by authorities as potentially harmful or threatening when used in public contexts. Alongside the phrase bans, the proposed laws strengthen prohibitions on symbols linked to extremist organisations, including those associated with Nazi groups and outlawed terrorist entities such as Hamas, Hezbollah and the Islamic State. Penalties for intimidation at places of worship could reach three years’ imprisonment, and attacks against religious officials or institutions could attract sentences of up to seven years.
Official Rationale: Safety and Community Protection
Government supporters argue the reforms come in response to community safety concerns, especially following the December Bondi Beach terror attack, which killed 15 people at a Hanukkah celebration and intensified public debate on antisemitism and extremist rhetoric in Australia. Premier Crisafulli characterised the laws as a “strong and considered response” intended to stamp out the embers of hatred that were allowed to burn unchecked, and to ensure Queenslanders feel safe in diverse communities. Jewish leaders, including representatives of the Queensland Jewish Board of Deputies, have welcomed the reforms as a meaningful step toward combating antisemitism and protecting religious minorities.
Attorney-General Frecklington emphasised that the bill includes reasoned legal defences, such as for educational or academic use, suggesting lawmakers intended to balance enforcement with protections for legitimate discussion or analysis.
Debate Over Meaning and Free Speech
The proposed outlawing of “from the river to the sea” — a phrase that references the geographic area between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea — has triggered debate about its meaning and implications. While critics of the slogan associate it with calls for the elimination of Israel and see it as inherently hostile or violent, supporters argue it expresses solidarity with Palestinian rights and liberation, not hatred toward Jews or encouragement of violence. The phrase has been subject to legal and political scrutiny in other countries, and its interpretation often depends on context. (turn0search42)
Opposition voices have raised concerns about free speech and civil liberties, arguing that broad bans on political slogans could set troubling precedents. Civil liberties advocates say restricting phrases widely used in protest movements risks chilling political expression and stifling debate — pointing out that in other jurisdictions, courts have ruled such expressions protected or have emphasised intent and context in free-speech considerations. Critics on social media and activist platforms have described the reforms as an aggressive crackdown on dissent rather than a narrowly targeted antisemitism response. (turn0search7)
Political and Social Ramifications
The proposed laws are expected to pass through Parliament amid heightened political attention, with state MPs from both major parties signalling varying levels of support or scrutiny. Some Labor and opposition figures have indicated support for tackling hate speech, while others remain cautious about the breadth of criminalisation. Observers note that similar reforms are under consideration in New South Wales — particularly regarding the phrase “globalise the intifada” — though NSW has not yet legislated an outright ban on the “from the river to the sea” slogan.
Queensland’s actions underline broader national and international debates about how to balance the fight against hate speech, community protection and civil liberties — particularly in relation to highly charged geopolitical conflicts played out on domestic streets. As the legislation advances, both supporters and opponents are likely to engage in vigorous public debate about the appropriateness and scope of state-level speech regulation in a democratic society.
7 years in the field, from local radio to digital newsrooms. Loves chasing the stories that matter to everyday Aussies – whether it’s climate, cost of living or the next big thing in tech.
